Hydro Power

Power Calculations



CAUTION !
This section is still under
CONSTRUCTION


1.0  Fundamentals

  To allow a thorough understanding of the issues involved in specifying and sizing the hardware required for a successful hydro power installation the following chapter takes you through the basic laws of physics which have to be obeyed if we are to generate any electricity from our installation.

  Hydro Power is essentially based upon the fundamental laws of physics which state that a 'body' may contain energy (amongst other means) by virtue of its velocity (through 'space') and/or by its relative height.  These are termed Kinetic and Potential Energy respectively.  Now the first law of thermodynamics states that 'Energy cannot be created of destroyed, but it's form may be changed'.  So knowing this we can already see that we may convert the 'Kinetic Energy' of fast moving water in a stream, or the 'Potential Energy' of a small pond high up a hillside to some other type of energy such as electricity !

  So how much energy does the water contain ??

  We can work out h (See chapter X for ways of determining this) but how do we know mass ?  Well we can work out the volume flowing in a period of time (see chapter Y for ways of determining this) and given that:   So the previous equations can now be written as :   However this is simply the energy in a volume of water, given that we've determined what volume flows in a given period of time (in our case, one second) these equations now become :  Now, as 1 Joule per second = 1 Watt, the above two equations actually give us power in Watts, which many of us are much more familiar with.

  So now that we understand the differences between potential and kinetic energy, and how to calculate their values, for a given system we finally know how many Watts of power, i.e. electricity, we will generate, right ?   Well no, not quite.....!

  Yes we know exactly how much energy is in the water at a point in time & space, and this as a very first check will indicate how much energy is available from the water, but in reality not all of this is available for conversion, e.g. in a turbine water needs some velocity on exit otherwise it wouldn't get out of the turbine !  Also for a turbine fed from a pipeline such as a pelton wheel, there will be losses in the pipeline giving a lower pressure (than that provided by static head alone) at nozzle the turbine.  So even on a very well designed installation using a 'high efficiency' turbine, transmission & generator, we may still lose some 50% of the initial energy by the time we have generated volts & amps.  In some installations, such as flow of river undershot water wheels, overall efficiency may be as low as 5% or 10%, ultimately it all depends upon the technology being used.

  To provide an accurate estimate of how much electricity we will actually generate requires several other factors to be taken into consideration.  These will be detailed in the next section and as you will see, depending upon the hardware that is actually used (some of which will be dictated by site conditions) different factors need to be considered.



 

2.0  Extracting the Energy  (NOTE: This and following sections not yet complete.)

  This category covers devices which typically float on a tethered pontoon of some sort.
  We can expand the Kinetc Energy equation further to account for the swept area of the propeller blades:  Assuming that the turbine is perpendicular to the direction of flow of the river, (in both planes), the volume of water passing through the blades of the turbine, of swept area A (m2), per second, is dependent upon the velocity of the river, v m/s.  In other words:
   Incorporating this into the Kinetic Equation ;   Now, in a run of river device, not all of this energy is available for extraction, as the water cannot simply stop when it leaves the turbine, it needs to posses some velocity (and hence energy) to move away from the turbine exit.  We also have inefficiencies in the turbine itself, denoted by its coefficient of performance, Cp.  (It can be shown theoretically that the maximum coefficient of performance for an unshrouded reaction device in a run of river configuration, is 0.59.)

  The above equation, assumes that the turbine is perpendicular to the current flow.  This may or may not be the case depending upon turbine design, so to allow for this we need to introduce a further factor:

The difference between these two is simply that the 'Kaplan' has blades which pivot to alter their angle of incidence to the flowing water.  They both differ from the above device (Sect. 2.2.3.1)  in that they are always shrouded, and are fitted in civil works between water of differing levels, e.g. tidal barage, albeit of small diffential head,  (typically 1-2M).

3.0   Energy Losses


To be  continued.....



Contact: Mike Munro BSc (Hons.) for further information.

[ Home Page | | Disclaimer ]

© Mike Munro
This page last updated 2nd November 2006